Transplant Rejection - pediagenosis
Article Update

Thursday, April 8, 2021

Transplant Rejection

Transplant Rejection
The success of organ grafts between identical (‘syngeneic’*) twins, and their rejection in all other cases, reflects the remarkable strength of immunological recognition of cell-surface antigens within a species. This is an unfortunate (and in the evolutionary sense unforeseeable) result of the specialization of T cells for detecting alterations of MHC antigens, upon which all adaptive responses depend (for a reminder of the central role of T-helper cells see Figs 19 and 21), plus the enormous degree of MHC polymorphism (different antigens in different individuals; see Fig. 11). It appears that when confronted with ‘non- self’ MHC molecules, T cells confuse them with ‘self plus antigen’, and in most cases probably ‘self plus virus’; several clear examples of this have already been found in mouse experiments. This may be one of the reasons for MHC polymorphism itself: the more different varieties of ‘self’ a species contains, the less likely is any particular virus to pass undetected and decimate the whole species. Differences in red cell (‘blood group’) antigens also give trouble in blood transfusion (top right) because of antibody; here the rationale for polymorphism is less obvious, but it is much more restricted (e.g. six ABO phenotypes compared with over 1012 for MHC). The ‘minor’ histocompatibility and blood group antigens appear to be both less polymorphic and antigenically weaker.

Transplant Rejection

Graft rejection can be mediated by T and/or B cells, with their usual non-specific effector adjuncts (complement, cytotoxic cells, macrophages, etc.), depending on the target: antibody destroys cells free in the blood, and reacts with vascular endothelium (e.g. of a grafted organ; centre) to initiate type II or III hypersensitivity, while T cells attack solid tissue directly or via macrophages (type IV). Unless the recipient is already sensitized to donor antigens, these processes do not take effect for a week or more, confirming that rejection is due to adaptive, not innate, immunity.
Successful organ grafting relies at present on (top left) matching donor and recipient MHC antigens as far as possible (relatives and especially siblings are more likely to share these), and (bottom right) suppressing the residual immune response. The ideal would be (bottom left) to induce specific unresponsiveness to MHC antigens, but this is still experimental (see Fig. 40).

Typing and matching
For blood transfusion, the principle is simple: A and/or B antigens are detected by agglutination with specific antisera; this is always necessary because normal individuals have antibody against whichever antigen they lack. Rh (Rhesus) antigens are also typed to avoid sensitizing women to those that a prospective child might carry, as Rh incompatibility can cause serious haemolytic disease in the fetus. Minor antigens only cause trouble in patients sensitized by repeated transfusions. Other possible consequences of blood transfusion are sensitization against MHC antigens carried on B cells and, in severely immunodeficient patients, GVH (graft-versus-host) reactions by transfused T cells against host antigens. The latter is a major complication of bone-marrow grafting.
For organ (e.g. kidney) grafting, MHC antigens must be typed by DNA typing, in which haplotype is determined using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and allele-specific pairs of primers. The success of kidney grafting is related to the degree of match, particularly class II (DR), although the better results with relatives suggest that there are other ‘minor’ histocompatibility loci, which are still being identified.

The initial event is the recognition of ‘altered self’ class II antigens by T-helper cells. This can occur either by direct contact with donor B cells or antigen-presenting cells (light green APC in figure) or via the uptake of soluble donor antigens (shaded circles) by the recipient’s own APC (darker green). After this, B cells, cytotoxic T cells and macrophages are all triggered into action, which response destroys the graft depends on the organ in question. Some points of special interest are listed below.
Kidney graft rejection can be immediate, due to ABO mismatch or pre-existing anti HLA antibodies, acute (weeks to months) due to the immune response or chronic (months to years) due to repeated minor rejection episodes or re-emergence of immune complex-mediated disease. Surprisingly, blood transfusion before grafting improves survival, perhaps by inducing enhancing antibodies against class II donor antigens. Immunosuppression has improved transplant success to over 70%, principally by decreasing the occurrence of acute rejection. The causes of chronic rejection, in contrast, remain poorly understood.
Bone marrow contains the haemopoietic stem cell, and is therefore required whenever it is necessary to replace the host haemopoietic system (e.g. in some immunodeficiencies or after high-dose chemo- therapy). The growth factor G-CSF causes haemopoietic stem cells to come out of the bone marrow and enter the circulation. As a result, blood can be used in place of bone marrow, a procedure known as peripheral stem cell transplantation. Any haemopoietic grafts are vigorously rejected, and require strong immunosuppression. In addition, they can kill the host by GVH reaction, unless T cells are removed from the donor marrow. In some cases GVH by the graft can help to kill the original tumour cells (graft-versus-tumour [GVT]), but balancing GVT and GVH remains a difficult clinical challenge.
Liver grafts are not so strongly rejected, and may even induce a degree of tolerance. HLA typing is less important. Sometimes, temporary organ transplants may be sufficient. In a recent example, a boy whose liver was damaged by a virus infection received adult liver cells coated with a chemical found in algae which prevented them from being attacked by the immune system. The donor cells survived a few months, long enough for the recipient’s liver to recover normal function.
Endocrine organs survive unexpectedly well if cultured or otherwise treated to remove the minority of cells expressing class II antigens.
Skin grafts are rejected very vigorously by T cells, perhaps because of their extensive vascularization. For this reason, skin transplantation is usually autologous or a temporary graft is used to protect the underlying tissue while the host’s own skin regenerates (e.g. after extensive burns).
Cornea and cartilage, being non-vascular tissues (immune privileged sites), are less accessible to the immune system. Nevertheless, corneas are rejected in about 25% of cases, although the mechanisms leading to graft recognition remain unclear.
The normal fetus is of course an allograft, and why it is not rejected is still something of a mystery, despite evidence for a number of possible mechanisms, including specific suppressor cells, serum blocking and immunosuppressive factors, and special properties of both placenta (maternal) and trophoblast (fetal).
Xenografts There is considerable interest in the possibility of using pigs as animal donors for organ transplantation because of the continuing shortfall of available human organs. However, pig xenografts are rejected in primates within minutes by a process of hyperacute rejection. This is due to a combination of preformed antibodies against carbohydrate structures found in pigs but not primates, and the fact that the complement-regulating proteins on pig tissue (e.g. DAF; see Fig. 6) do not interact well with human complement. There is also continuing concern that pigs may harbour novel retroviruses, which could ‘jump’ the species barrier during transplantation and cause a new epidemic similar to AIDS.
Organ cloning Because of the continual shortage of donors for organ transplants, there is enormous excitement about the possibility of growing ‘designer’ organs by differentiating stem cells (whether embryonic or non-embryonic) in culture. There has been great progress towards achieving this remarkable technical feat in animal models. However, as embryonic stem cells will generally be derived from a different individual than the organ recipient, the question of immunological rejection remains.

Immunosuppression  (for  further  details  see  Fig.  40) Non-specific  The success of modern transplantation surgery is due largely to the introduction of cyclosporin, and later FK506, two drugs that selectively block the activation of T cells in an antigen non-specific way (see Fig. 12). These two drugs, together with some cytotoxic drugs, are used at high concentrations postoperatively to block the initial acute rejection, and then at lower maintenance doses to block chronic rejection. Some other approaches are shown in Fig. 40.
Specific suppression is directed at either the antigens inducing a response or the receptors on the cells carrying it out. When brought about by antibody, this is conventionally called enhancement and when by antigen, tolerance. Antigen-specific suppression is the goal of transplantation immunologists, but has still to be demonstrated in humans.
Regulatory T cells (TREG) can suppress ongoing immune responses in an antigen-specific way (see Fig. 22). Isolating and expanding TREG cells in culture and then reintroducing them into a graft recipient has shown considerable promise in preventing rejection in animal models, and ways to translate this into clinical treatments are being actively pursued.

Share with your friends

Give us your opinion

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

This is just an example, you can fill it later with your own note.