Heart Transplantation: Procedure, Techniques, Patient Selection, and Long-Term Outcomes - pediagenosis
Article Update
Loading...

Tuesday, November 10, 2026

Heart Transplantation: Procedure, Techniques, Patient Selection, and Long-Term Outcomes

Medical illustration showing the 10-step technique of orthotopic biatrial cardiac transplantation, including recipient heart preparation, donor heart excision, atrial anastomosis, pulmonary artery and aortic connections, and the completed heart transplant.


HEART TRANSPLANTATION

Transplantation of the heart has been surgically feasible since 1960, when the essence of the surgical method was propounded. The important restrictions of the immune reaction and recipient selection remain, even though clinical experience was begun with the work of Barnard in South Africa and Kantrowitz in New York. Several early problems (e.g., surgical method) required solution before any animal could survive orthotopic homotransplantation of the heart. Another problem was protection of the donor heart against irreversible damage from its removal to reestablishment of coronary circulation. Also, the heart-transplantation physiologic process involved assessment of the effect of total cardiac denervation. Drugs such as digoxin had no effect on the A-V node; atropine had no chronotropic effect; nifedipine had no reflex tachycardia; and verapamil and beta blockers were still useful to treat supraventricular tachycardia.

The midline sternotomy provides optimal exposure. Protection of the heart transplant is achieved by cooling with physiologic saline solution at 2° to 4° C. Plate 6-141 illustrates the surgical method of biatrial transplantation, which depends on retention in the host of parts of both atria and the interatrial septum to which the transplant is sutured. Accordingly, after division of the aorta and pulmonary trunk immediately above their respective semilunar valves, the atria are incised so as to leave intact parts of the right and left atrial walls and the atrial septum of the recipient. Because of the disproportion between the normal donor heart and the larger recipient organ, the donor heart is removed by individual division of each of the six inflow veins. Conceivably, in infants and children, the donor heart may be of the same size as that of the recipient; if so, individual sectioning of donor inflow vessels would not be necessary. Plate 6-142 illustrates the technique of bicaval transplantation.

Resuscitation of the donor heart is mandatory before proceeding with thoracotomy in the recipient. The explanted donor heart is infused with cardioplegia and cooled. Ventricular fibrillation of the donor heart routinely develops, and no attempt is made to convert this arrhythmia to an effective contraction.

Follow-up of Transplant Patient

After cardiac transplantation, the patient requires follow-up by physicians expert in heart failure and knowledgeable in immunology and infectious disease, with a focus on cardiac function, cardiac rejection, anticipation of possible rejection, and treatment of rejection and other aspects of immunosuppression, such as drug interaction. In addition, recipients must recognize their responsibility to take care of the transplanted heart. When all this is accomplished, the average survival of a transplant recipient is 10 years. Late deaths are usually from transplant coronary artery vasculopathy. A few patients live 20 years or more, possibly related to their course, which had few episodes of rejection, infection, or malignancy.


Medical illustration showing the steps of bicaval cardiac transplantation, including donor heart preparation, recipient vessel anastomoses, and completed heart transplant.



Moral, Ethical, and Social Implications

The several years’ delay for the successful application of orthotopic homotransplantation of the heart in humans was the result of the necessary experience with immune suppression in the initiation of heart transplants as well as the long-term laboratory observations determining whether absent CNS reflexes had prohibi- tively deleterious effects on cardiac performance. Also

experimentally, a demand form of immunosuppressi was formulated to cope specifically with the heart trans- plants. Merely transposing accepted immune chemotherapy from kidney transplants to heart transplants tended to oversimplify the problem.

One of the most challenging and difficult aspects of human heart homotransplantation is selection of the recipient. Any patient whose heart has failed to the point where replacement is indicated may have irreversible damage of other organ systems. Cardiac transplantation, has little to offer the patient at risk for sudden cardiac death from any cause. Acute cardiac care units have greatly reduced early mortality from ventricular fibrillation and other arrhythmias secondary to acute myocardial infarction. Modern therapy of heart failure and acute MI may have reduced the need for heart transplant, even though severe heart failure from MI is still a prominent indication for transplant.

Probably the most appropriate adult candidate for heart transplantation is the patient with severe nonischemic cardiomyopathy. These patients often present a

relatively long history of marginal compensation, but with increasingly frequent episodes of decompensation. The patient does not rally, unlike the typical patient with coronary artery disease. In the last stages of nonischemic cardiomyopathy, heart transplantation may be the only therapeutic application of choice. The secondary effects of CAD, such as ventricular aneurysm, mitral valve insufficiency, or ventricular septal defect, frequently are well treated by conventional open-heart surgery, but no such program is available for the patient in the terminal phases of nonischemic cardiomyopathy. The etiologic factors in unrelenting heart failure are not well understood, but viral infections may play a role.


Medical illustration comparing HeartMate XVE pulsatile and HeartMate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), showing device placement, external battery packs, blood flow, and internal pump mechanisms.



Another important application of heart transplantation is in the infant with a congenital cardiac anomaly for whom there is no corrective operation or palliative procedure. Great difficulty is encountered in this group of patients because of a paucity of donors and technical surgical problems.

The successful transplantation of the liver by Starzl and associates established the transplantation of unpaired organs. The general public appeared ready for the concept that death of the individual occurs stepwise, with the brain dying first, then the heart, liver, and kidneys undergoing irreversible damage. These organs clearly cannot be transplanted, and various methods are necessary to resuscitate the heart in a prospective donor who had brain death. Recipient selection may be more controversial than donor selection. Time and practice has permitted the evolution of satisfactory criteria for transplant recipients.

The advent of clinical heart transplantation does not relegate the development of ventricular-assist devices (VADs) to total obscurity. At this time, VADs are used as a bridge to transplant and in some patients as “destination therapy” (see Plate 6-143). The future of heart replacement has by no means been settled with the initial application of homotransplantation. Future strides will consist of important research in the area of rejection, including better monitoring, better immunosuppression, and better organ preservation. If the issue of immune tolerance can be overcome, cardiac transplant patients may live normal life spans.


Share with your friends

Give us your opinion

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Notification
This is just an example, you can fill it later with your own note.
Done